Hello,
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed in V7993.
We have tested the following case:
foo o->o]
[o->o foo2
foo3 o<-o]
[o<-o foo4
foo ->o]
[o-> foo2
foo3 <-o]
[o<- foo4
foo o->o foo1
foo ->o foo1
foo o->o foo
foo ->o foo
foo o-> foo
If you find any other issue regarding "o", thanks to post here,
Regards,