Recent new feature that packages are regarded as namespace is welcomed.
I think these two examples should be the same result, but they don't.
Ex1.
package ddd {
package aaa {
class ccc
}
package bbb {
class ccc
ccc <|- ddd.aaa.ccc
}
}Ex2.
package ddd {
package aaa {
class ccc
}
package bbb {
class ccc
ccc <|- aaa.ccc
}
}Ex1 draws my expected figure.
Ex2 generates a class 'ddd.bbb.aaa.ccc' which is not expected.
That is, 'ddd.' shouldn't be required under the namespace of 'ddd', I think. When full namespace path is needed, reusing sub contents in a package into another package will be difficult.
FYI, removing 'package ddd' from two examples above results in the same figure. This is my expected results.
Is there some good manner to use hierarchical namespaces?
As an idea, is there any way to escape a package to be part of namespace?
