Mixing old syntax in the new Action Diagram syntax

0 votes
asked Jul 4, 2013 in To be sorted by anonymous

I am liking the new syntax for action diagrams.

However, once in a while, we need to explicity introduce a branch from one node to another. AFAICT, there is no way to do this currently in the new syntax.

It would be great if we can specify a label for each statement and then use that to branch. For example:

start

if (happy?) then (yes)

  happyStart: I am happy;

else (no)

  :I am sad;

endif

--> [I am happy again] happyStart

 

Explanation:

happyStart is a label for the node "I am happy".

The second part of the request is:

We should be able to use the old syntax mixed with the new one, to jump to a label etc.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:

[Antispam2 Feature: please please wait 1 or 2 minutes (this message will disappear) before pressing the button otherwise it will fail](--------)
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.
...