Proper way to write an Use Case Description

Question

I'm trying to mimic a Use Case Description using salt. This is what I'd like to achieve.

I've come up with this

@startsalt

{#

Nome | .

Descrizione | .

Attori | .

Precondizioni | .

Postcondizioni | .

Flusso di controllo principale | .

Flussi di controllo alternativi | {T+

# Step1        | .

## SubStep1     | .

### SSubStep1    | .

### SSubStep2    | .

### SSubStep3    | .

}

Eccezioni | .

}

@endsalt

Is there a better way to do it? Am I missing something?

Thank you for this amazing tool.

Answer 1

Salt has not be designed for table, but yes, you can use it like this.

There are some support for table in creole also (see http://plantuml.com/creole ) but with many limitations, so your solution is better

http://www.plantuml.com/plantuml/uml/DOyn3eCm34LtJl7dd8AgBDtR0uHWYYLmsjWH2uUlQTh5ilpzlvzxjLYiRcjNbL9KmfnpjzAJPEeEIDm81-uBmNLSpuKsSp64sn22onS1JoJ6CrE1BT70YYhyhWJBe9WMFFx-PXr8K-6NSPQMWR4mpL1oaoHgCKvdfDZFtXf4mHx5zCmT2N5SloUcxBdEZ1zwxyM_-W00

Maybe we are going to improve table support in creole (at least to have \n in cells)

Comments

Ok cool. Thank you for your time!